Which remedy is commonly sought under the doctrine of Part Performance?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Real Estate Transactions Exam. Study with comprehensive questions, detailed hints, and explanations to enhance your knowledge and pass the exam with ease. Get exam-ready today!

The doctrine of Part Performance is a legal principle that allows a party to enforce an oral contract for the sale of real property, despite the requirement for such contracts to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. This doctrine is based on the idea that certain actions taken by a party, which demonstrate reliance on the contract, might justify enforcement despite the lack of a formal written agreement.

Equitable relief is the remedy commonly sought under the doctrine of Part Performance because it involves asking the court to enforce the contract in a manner consistent with fairness and justice. Since Part Performance indicates that one party has begun fulfilling their obligations under the contract (such as taking possession of the property or making improvements), a court may grant specific performance, which is a type of equitable relief that compels the party to fulfill their obligations under the contract.

Monetary damages would typically compensate for a loss rather than enforce a specific agreement, while rescission of contract seeks to cancel the contract entirely rather than uphold an agreement based on part performance. Injunction relief aims to prevent a party from taking certain actions rather than supporting the execution of a contract. Therefore, equitable relief aligns with the intent of the doctrine of Part Performance, which seeks to honor the parties' actions and intentions toward creating

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy