What actions are typically used to invoke the Part Performance Doctrine?

The Part Performance Doctrine is primarily concerned with circumstances where parties are attempting to enforce a contract that may not meet the traditional requirements of enforceability, particularly within the context of real estate transactions. To successfully invoke this doctrine, specific actions must be demonstrated that indicate the parties' serious intent and reliance on an agreement.

When employing the Part Performance Doctrine, the actions that are typically recognized include taking possession of the property, making a payment or a portion of the purchase price, and making improvements to the property. These actions support an assertion that the parties are treating the agreement as binding, despite the formalities usually required for a contract, such as a written document or formal signatures.

Possession indicates that the buyer is acting as though they own the property; partial payment suggests a willingness to fulfill financial obligations under the agreement; and improvements made to the property demonstrate a commitment to the transaction. Together, these actions substantiate the claimant's position that a legitimate agreement exists, thus allowing relief despite the absence of a fully executed contract.

The other options involve actions that do not directly relate to the invocation of the Part Performance Doctrine. For example, sharing tax documents or credit checks relates to financial scrutiny and qualification processes but does not demonstrate direct engagement with the property itself as required