In a real estate transaction, what can happen if the transfer violates a K promise?

When a transfer in a real estate transaction violates a K promise, it can indeed lead to litigation. A K promise refers to a contractual obligation that each party agrees to uphold during the transaction. If one party fails to comply with their contractual promises, the aggrieved party may seek legal remedies to enforce the terms of the contract or to recover damages due to the breach. Litigation can arise as a means of resolving disputes over the failure to meet these obligations, thereby ensuring that any grievances are addressed through the judicial system.

The other options do not accurately capture the legal consequences of such a violation. For instance, the notion that there are no legal implications does not hold true, as breaches of contract often result in significant legal repercussions. While a refund may be a possible outcome in certain circumstances, it is not guaranteed; the nature of the remedy would depend on the specific terms of the contract and the relationship between the parties. Lastly, while a violation of a K promise can lead to contract voidance, this is not an automatic response, as the parties may negotiate terms or settle the dispute in various ways.